Re: [patch 5/5] sched: consolidate sbe sbf

* Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> >
> >One problem I just noticed, sorry. This is doing set_cpus_allowed
> >without holding the runqueue lock and without checking the hard
> >affinity mask either.
> >
> 
> Err, that is to say set_task_cpu, not set_cpus_allowed.

yes. The whole cpus_allowed+set_task_cpu() section in copy_process() 
should move into sched_fork().

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 1/5] sched: remove degenerate domains
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • [patch 3/5] sched: multilevel sbe and sbf
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • [patch 4/5] sched: RCU sched domains
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • [patch 5/5] sched: consolidate sbe sbf
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 5/5] sched: consolidate sbe sbf
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 5/5] sched: consolidate sbe sbf
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
• Next by Date: Re: Kernel SCM saga..
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 5/5] sched: consolidate sbe sbf
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 5/5] sched: consolidate sbe sbf
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]