On Apr 6, 2005 4:28 PM, Malcolm Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Magnus Damm writes:
> > And I guess the idea of replacing the initcall pointer with NULL will
> > work both with and without function descriptors, right? So we should
> > be safe on IA64 and PPC64.
>
> I think so, though I don't really know a great deal about this area.
>
> An IA64 descriptor is of the form { &code, &data_context }, and a function
> pointer is a pointer to such a descriptor. Presumably, setting a function
> pointer to NULL will either end up setting the pointer-to-descriptor to NULL
> or the code pointer to NULL, but either way, I would expect the 'if
> (!*call)' comparison to work as intended.
>
> Best thing would be to get someone on IA64 and/or PPC64 to check this for
> you.
I agree. Do we have any friendly IA64/PPC64 user out there?
> Also might be worth checking that the patch works as intended with
> CONFIG_MODULES=n (assuming you haven't already).
The code works both with CONFIG_MODULES set to "y" and unset.
Thanks,
/ magnus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
