On Tuesday 05 April 2005 21:00, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Tue, 5 April 2005 17:26:31 +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
> >
> > Would this be a good thing to clean up, or isn't it worth the effort at all?
>
> I would welcome such a stream of patches. But in spite of the calloc
> interface being rather stupid, I'd prefer to see patches with kcalloc
> instead of kmalloc_zero.
kcalloc call will have three params pushed on stack. in 99% of cases
it could be done with two. If anyone's going to do it, please create
and use
void *kzalloc(size, gfp_mask)
or zalloc, kmalloc_zero... whatever.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
