* Mikael Pettersson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > - jz restore_all
> > + jz restore_nocheck
> > testl $IF_MASK,EFLAGS(%esp) # interrupts off (exception path) ?
> > - jz restore_all
> > + jz restore_nocheck
> > call preempt_schedule_irq
> > jmp need_resched
> > #endif
>
> Is this sufficient or do we also need the
> s/restore_all/restore_nocheck/ at around line 553 which was in the
> first posted patch?
all 3 restore_all->restore_nocheck changes are needed to make the bug
not trigger. I dont think it's a real fix because whatever is being
preempted involuntarily, it ought to have a proper kernel stack to begin
with. I'll do some more debugging.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]