On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:39:02 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:36:58AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> One of the options is to even ship the firmware in the kernel tarbal but
>> from a separate directory with a clear license clarification text in it.
>
> I think that's what we should do. I currently don't have any firmware
> requiring devices, but I'd volunteer to keep such a tarball for now if
> no one else wants to do tiny amount of work.
FYI, I just created this, it might be useful for all this:
http://wiki.debian.net/?KernelFirmwareLicensing
I'm still adding driver information..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]