Hi!
> > You have a few things here that can easily conflict, and that will be
> > developed at different paces. I like the direction that it's going, but
> > how do you intend to do it gradually. I.e. what to do first?
>
> I think the first step would be for us to all agree on a design, whether
> it be this one or another, so we can began planning for long term
> changes.
>
> My arguments for these changes are as follows:
0. I do not see how to gradually roll this in.
> 4. Having responsibilities at each driver level encourages a
> layered and object based design, reducing code duplication and
> complexity.
Unfortunately, you'll be retrofiting this to existing drivers. AFAICS,
trying to force existing driver to "layered and object based design"
can only result in mess.
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
