Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.43-00

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Esben Nielsen wrote:

> > I'm sure a lot of the yield() users could be converted to 
> > schedule_timeout(), some of the users i saw were for low memory conditions 
> > where we want other tasks to make progress and complete so that we a bit 
> > more free memory.
> > 
> 
> Easy, but damn ugly. Completions are the right answer. The memory system
> needs a queue system where tasks can sleep (with a timeout) until the
> right amount of memory is available instead of half busy-looping.

I agree entirely, that would definitely be a better way to go eventually.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux