Paul Jackson <[email protected]> writes: > > We already expose the SLIT table node distances (using SN2 specific > /proc files today, others are working on an arch-neutral mechanism). There is already an arch neutral mechanism in sysfs, see /sys/devices/system/node/node*/distance That should be exactly SLIT on x86-64 and IA64 where node_distance() reports SLIT data. But of course SLIT doesn't know anything about cache latencies. /Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs
- References:
- RE: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels
- From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]>
- [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels]
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels]
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels]
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- RE: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels
- Prev by Date: Re: Crash during boot for 2.6.12-rc2.
- Next by Date: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels]
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs
- Index(es):
 |