Re: [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 08/13] scsi: move request preps in other places into prep_fn()

[Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>]

 Hello, James.

James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 14:25 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > Ah.. with later requeue path consolidation patches, all requests get
> > their sense buffer cleared during requeueing, which, IMHO, is more
> > logical.  Moving scsi_init_cmd_errh() should come after the patch.
> > Sorry. :-)
> >
> > I'll make another take of this patchset (maybe subset) after issues
> > are resolved.  I'll split and reorder relocation of scsi_init_cmd_errh
> > then.
>
>
> Thanks.  It would help me enormously if you explained what bugs you were
> fixing at the top of each patch,

 Well, I'll try harder.

> and also only do patchsets that are
> dependent on each other (I already have your serial_numer_at_timeout and
> internal_timeout removal patches in the scsi-misc-2.6 tree).

 No problem.  Do you want me to do that now?  Or is it okay to do the 
next take after you review the request_fn rewrite patch?

 Thanks.

--
tejun

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/