On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:46:20PM -0700, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>
> Hi Nigel!
>
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:14:25AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 01:33, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > > > Yes, exactly. Someone who understand do_exit please help clean
>
> No, that wouldn't work. I am saying that there's little to gain by
> adding all this complexity for destroying the idle tasks when it's
> fairly simple to create num_possible_cpus() - 1 idle tasks* to
> accommodate any additional cpus which may come along. This is what
> ppc64 does now, and it should be feasible on any architecture which
> supports cpu hotplug.
>
> Nathan
>
> * num_possible_cpus() - 1 because the idle task for the boot cpu is
> created in sched_init.
>
In ia64 we create idle threads on demand if one is not available for the same
logical cpu number, and re-used when the same logical cpu number is re-used.
just a minor improvement, i also thought about idle exit, but wasnt worth
anything in return.
Cheers,
ashok
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]