Re: [patch 2/3] hd eliminate bad section references

[maximilian attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>]

On Mon, 04 Apr 2005, Randy.Dunlap wrote:

> >-static int parse_hd_setup (char *line) {
> >+static int __init parse_hd_setup (char *line) {
.. 
> This one is fairly interesting and needs some resolution by someone
> who knows....

thanks a lot for your quick and profund feedback.
 
> On the surface, the patch is correct.
> 
> Rusty, can you explain when __setup functions are called relative
> to in-kernel init functions?  or put another way, can a __setup
> function safely call in __init function?
> 
> Here's the function in question:
> 
> static int parse_hd_setup (char *line) {
> 	int ints[6];
> 
> 	(void) get_options(line, ARRAY_SIZE(ints), ints);
> 	hd_setup(NULL, ints);
> 
> 	return 1;
> }
> __setup("hd=", parse_hd_setup);
> 
> 
> 
> Should we make parse_hd_setup() __init,
> or make hd_setup() non-__init, or something else?
> 
> {time passes, he looks]
> 
> OK, I looked at include/linux/init.h.  From what I can see
> there, __setup() causes an .init.setup section to be emitted,
> so marking __setup() function as __init would make sense.
> I think that this patch is good.

i saw that ide_setup() is __init as a bunch of lots others.
yes init.h confirms that. :)

--
maks
kernel janitor  	http://janitor.kernelnewbies.org/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/