Re: PCI: increase the size of the pci.ids strings

On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:47:48 -0800, Greg KH wrote:

> -#define PCI_NAME_SIZE	96
> +#define PCI_NAME_SIZE	255
>  #define PCI_NAME_HALF	__stringify(43)	/* less than half to handle slop */

Shouldn't PCI_NAME_HALF be changed too? To something like 109 or 113?

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta

Axiom I of the Giuseppe Bilotta
theory of IT:
Anything is better than MS

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [BK PATCH] PCI update for 2.6.12-rc1
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • PCI: increase the size of the pci.ids strings
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/2] cifs: whitespace cleanups for fs/cifs/smberr.h part 1
• Next by Date: Re: Oops in i810_audio (reply to herbert)
• Previous by thread: Re: PCI: fix an oops in some pci devices on hotplug remove when their resources are being freed.
• Next by thread: [Patch] sched: remove unnecessary sched domains
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]