Re: Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in arm

[Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>]

On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 12:44:14PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > This fixes u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in arm. I was not able to
> > > even compile it, but it should not cause any problems. Please apply,
> > 
> > On testing this patch, it doesn't build.  You need to include
> > linux/pm.h into linux/sysdev.h for starters, and fix sysdev.h
> > to also use pm_message_t in it's function pointers.
> > 
> > Therefore, I'd like the following patch either to be in mainline first,
> > or in my ARM tree for Linus to pull so ARM doesn't completely break
> > on my next merge.
> 
> That patch was recently merged into -mm, so I hope its okay... Thanks
> for testing. (And sorry, I did not realize patches depend on each
> other this way).

Grumble.  So it hasn't been merged before the ARM changes, which means
mainline is now broken for ARM.  I knew I should've just thrown it
straight in along with the stuff depending on it. ;(

Linus - is the pm.h included in sysdev.h in -rc2?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/