Re: [PATCH] don't check for NULL before calling kfree() in fs/ntfs/

Hi,

On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 23:25 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> (please keep me on CC)
>
> There's no need to check a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it - 
> kfree() handles NULL pointers just fine on its own.

Thanks.  Applied to my ntfs development tree so it should be in the next
-mm tree.

Apologies for the delay but I have been ill for two weeks and have been
catching up with things ever since...

Best regards,

        Anton
-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] don't check for NULL before calling kfree() in fs/ntfs/
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RESEND 1] 8250_hp300: unuse register_serial/unregister_serial
• Next by Date: Re: iomapping a big endian area
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] don't check for NULL before calling kfree() in fs/ntfs/
• Next by thread: [PATCH libata-dev-2.6] libata: flush COMRESET write
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]