Mark wrote:
> Probably all Linux binary drivers *are* compiled using GPL'd header files,
> and thus are themselves subject to the GPL.
I doubt that there is a consensus that simply compiling something with
a GPL header necessarily and always subjects it to the GPL. See your lawyer.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- References:
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- From: Aaron Gyes <[email protected]>
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- From: Aaron Gyes <[email protected]>
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- From: Zan Lynx <[email protected]>
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] ppc: fix bogosity in process-freezing code
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][SELINUX] Add name_connect permission check
- Previous by thread: Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- Next by thread: Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- Index(es):
 |