Em Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:46:03PM -0600, James Bottomley escreveu:
> Well, this is a brown paper bag for someone. The new protocol
/me using such bag now :(
Thanks a lot for the fix.
David, Please apply.
> registration locking uses a rwlock to limit access to the protocol list.
> Unfortunately, the initialisation:
>
> static rwlock_t proto_list_lock;
>
> Only works to initialise the lock as unlocked on platforms whose unlock
> signal is all zeros. On other platforms, they think it's already locked
> and hang forever.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
>
>
> ===== net/core/sock.c 1.67 vs edited =====
> --- 1.67/net/core/sock.c 2005-03-26 17:04:35 -06:00
> +++ edited/net/core/sock.c 2005-04-02 13:37:20 -06:00
> @@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_common_release);
>
> -static rwlock_t proto_list_lock;
> +static DEFINE_RWLOCK(proto_list_lock);
> static LIST_HEAD(proto_list);
>
> int proto_register(struct proto *prot, int alloc_slab)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
