Re: [Patch] sched: remove unnecessary sched domains

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:07:27PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:

I was thinking we could fix that by running balance on fork/exec multiple
times from top to bottom level domains. I'll have to measure the cost of
doing that, because it may be worthwhile.


Agreed.

BTW, why are we setting SD_BALANCE_FORK flag for NUMA domain on i386, ia64.
This should be set only on x86_64 and that too not for Intel systems.


Mainly to see whether anyone reports regressions, and to exercise
the code a bit.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux