Ingo wrote:
> but i'd too go for the simpler 'pseudo-distance' function, because it's
> so much easier to iterate through it. But it's not intuitive. Maybe it
> should be called 'connection ID': a unique ID for each uniqe type of
> path between CPUs.
Well said. Thanks.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- RE: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels
- From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]>
- Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- RE: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels
- Prev by Date: 2.6.11ac5 oops while reconstructing md array and moving volumegroup with pvmove
- Next by Date: Re: PCI-Express not working/unuseable on Intel 925XE Chipset since 2.6.12-rc1[mm1-4]
- Previous by thread: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels
- Next by thread: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels
- Index(es):
 |