Re: Low file-system performance for 2.6.11 compared to 2.4.26

linux-os wrote:

For those interested, some file-system tests and a test-tools
are attached.

I'll give it a run when I get a chance. Thanks.
In the meantime, can you try with different io schedulers?

Also, my .signature disappeared during the file-system tests.
There were no errors and e2fsck thinks everything is fine!

You seem to be constantly plagued by gremlins. I don't
know whether to laugh or cry.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Low file-system performance for 2.6.11 compared to 2.4.26
    • From: "Richard B. Johnson" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Low file-system performance for 2.6.11 compared to 2.4.26
    • From: linux-os <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] I2C: Kill unused struct members in w83627hf driver
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc1-mm4] fork_connector: add a fork connector
• Previous by thread: Re: Low file-system performance for 2.6.11 compared to 2.4.26
• Next by thread: Re: Low file-system performance for 2.6.11 compared to 2.4.26
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]