On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 13:27, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:04:57AM -0800, Rajesh Shah wrote:
> > > - Are you wanting the acpi specific patches to go into the
> tree
> > > through the acpi developers? How about the ia64 specific
> > > patches?
> >
> > I honestly don't know what the best approach is here - what do you
> > recommend? I did receive an email from Andrew indicating he wants
> > to pick these up for the next mm. Perhaps the best thing is to
> > let Andrew include the whole series after I've addressed all
> > feedback and you, Tony, Len etc. all agree these are OK to go in.
>
> That sounds like a fine plan to me.
Me too.
And I don't see any issues with the ACPI specific changes.
cheers,
-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
