* Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, here it finally is. There's still things I don't like about it.
> But it seems to work, and that's the important part.
>
> I had to reluctantly add two items to the task_struct. I was hoping
> to avoid that. But because of race conditions it seemed to be the only
> way.
well it's not a big problem, and we avoided having to add flags to the
rt_lock structure, which is the important issue.
your patch looks good, i've added it to my tree and have uploaded the
-26-00 patch. It boots fine on my testbox, except for some new messages:
knodemgrd_0/902: BUG in __down_complete at kernel/rt.c:1568
[<c0103956>] dump_stack+0x23/0x25 (20)
[<c0130dcd>] down_trylock+0x1fb/0x200 (48)
[<c0364ee2>] nodemgr_host_thread+0xd0/0x17b (48)
[<c0100d4d>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb (136249364)
---------------------------
| preempt count: 00000001 ]
| 1-level deep critical section nesting:
----------------------------------------
.. [<c0133a75>] .... print_traces+0x1b/0x52
.....[<c0103956>] .. ( <= dump_stack+0x23/0x25)
this goes away if i revert your patch. It seems the reason is that
trylock hasnt been updated to use the pending-owner logic?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
