On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, H. J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 07:57:28AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
There is no such an instruction of "movl %ds,(%eax)". The old assembler accepts it and turns it into "movw %ds,(%eax)".I disagree. Violently. As does the old assembler, which does not turn "mov" into "movw" as you say. AT ALL.I should have made myself clear. By "movw %ds,(%eax)", I meant: 8c 18 movw %ds,(%eax) That is what the assembler generates, and should have generated, for "movw %ds,(%eax)" since Nov. 4, 2004.
Could this be the reason for the reported slowdown in the last six months? -- Pau - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- i386/x86_64 segment register issuses (Re: PATCH: Fix x86 segment register access)
- From: "H. J. Lu" <[email protected]>
- Re: i386/x86_64 segment register issuses (Re: PATCH: Fix x86 segment register access)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: i386/x86_64 segment register issuses (Re: PATCH: Fix x86 segment register access)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: i386/x86_64 segment register issuses (Re: PATCH: Fix x86 segment register access)
- From: "H. J. Lu" <[email protected]>
- Re: i386/x86_64 segment register issuses (Re: PATCH: Fix x86 segment register access)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: i386/x86_64 segment register issuses (Re: PATCH: Fix x86 segment register access)
- From: "H. J. Lu" <[email protected]>
- Re: i386/x86_64 segment register issuses (Re: PATCH: Fix x86 segment register access)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: i386/x86_64 segment register issuses (Re: PATCH: Fix x86 segment register access)
- From: "H. J. Lu" <[email protected]>
- i386/x86_64 segment register issuses (Re: PATCH: Fix x86 segment register access)
- Prev by Date: question about do_IRQ + 4k stacks
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Set MS_ACTIVE in isofs_fill_super()
- Previous by thread: Re: i386/x86_64 segment register issuses (Re: PATCH: Fix x86 segment register access)
- Next by thread: Re: i386/x86_64 segment register issuses (Re: PATCH: Fix x86 segment register access)
- Index(es):