On 30/03/2005 12:50:01 linux-kernel-owner wrote:
>> I'd be interested in the answer as well. I have a driver which does
>> udelay(100), so no 1000 but anyway, and of course I end up having the
X86_64
>> kernel happily crying. I'm moving to a little state-machine to allow
for a
>> multi-pass approach instead of busy-polling..
>> regards
>
>schedule_timeout() would come to mind.
Not from a tasklet. ;)
I had a custom primitive some time ago which I imaginatively named
taskletex. When scheduling a tasklet one could then specifiy a delay in
jiffies. If zero, a normal tasklet would be scheduled and if >0 a timer
would be added. Nothing fancy or special really, but it was useful for the
work I was doing at that time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
