Re: Delay in a tasklet.

> I'd be interested in the answer as well. I have a driver which does
> udelay(100), so no 1000 but anyway, and of course I end up having the X86_64
> kernel happily crying. I'm moving to a little state-machine to allow for a
> multi-pass approach instead of busy-polling..
> regards

schedule_timeout() would come to mind.



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
No TOFU for me, please.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Delay in a tasklet.
    • From: "Bouchard, Sebastien" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Delay in a tasklet.
    • From: Davide Rossetti <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] FRV: Cleanup unused variable
• Next by Date: 2.6.11, IDE: Strange scheduling behaviour: high-pri RT process not scheduled?
• Previous by thread: Re: Delay in a tasklet.
• Next by thread: Re: Delay in a tasklet.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]