Hi,
On Tuesday, 29 of March 2005 23:12, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > I don't really want us to try execve during resume... Could we simply
> > > artifically fail that execve with something if (in_suspend()) return
> > > -EINVAL; [except that in_suspend() just is not there, but there were
> > > some proposals to add it].
> > >
> > > Or just avoid calling hotplug at all in resume case? And then do
> > > coldplug-like scan when userspace is ready...
> > >
> >
> > I am leaning towards calling disable_usermodehelper (not writtent yet)
> > after swsusp completes snapshotting memory. We really don't care about
> > hotplug events in this case and this will allow keeping "normal"
> > resume in drivers as is. What do you think?
>
> That would certianly do the trick.
>
> [Or perhaps in_suspend() is slightly nicer solution? People wanted it
> for other stuff (sanity checking, like BUG_ON(in_suspend())), too....]
IMHO, they are not mutually exclusive. However, by using
disable_usermodehelper we would get rid of the reason (ie hotplug events)
instead of just curing the symptoms (ie execve() during suspend).
Greets,
Rafael
--
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
- That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.
-- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]