On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:12:01PM -0500, jamal wrote:
>
> This is being discussed on netdev at the moment. Thomas Graf is working
> on a patch.
> Thanks for the effort though.
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
No worries. What exactly is the point of contention on netdev? (I'm not
currently following that list). My patch seems to follow the common practice
for CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT, in that all references to the action member of the
appropriate struct are themselves ifdef-ed.
Regards,
Neil
> On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 15:25, Neil Horman wrote:
> > Patch to fix build break that occurs when CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
> >
> > cls_fw.c | 3 ++-
> > cls_route.c | 3 ++-
> > cls_tcindex.c | 3 ++-
> > cls_u32.c | 2 ++
> > 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
>
>
--
/***************************************************
*Neil Horman
*Software Engineer
*Red Hat, Inc.
*[email protected]
*gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1
*http://pgp.mit.edu
***************************************************/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
