Re: [PATCH 0/5] timers: description

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> > Same problems here with occasional hangs w/o changes to schedule_timeout.
>
> Bad. You are runnning 2.6.12-rc1-mm1 ?

Not sure if this is really related to your patches. Its 2.6.11 with your
patches extracted from mm.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- RE: [PATCH 0/5] timers: description
  - From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]>
- RE: [PATCH 0/5] timers: description
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] timers: description
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel
Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/2] fork_connector: add a fork connector
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] timers: description
Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc1-mm2] relayfs: properly handle oversized events
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]