Re: [PATCH] slab: kfree(null) is unlikely

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > ChangeSet 1.2231.1.8, 2005/03/28 19:18:25-08:00, [email protected]
> > 
> > 	[PATCH] slab: kfree(null) is unlikely
> > 	
> > 	- mark kfree(NULL) as being unlikely
> 
> This is just a wild guess, right?

More like a judgement based on experience?

> Seems to me, it depends on the code.
> 

If someone is doing kfree(0) with sufficient frequency for this patch to
matter, then they need to stop doing that, rather than pessimising kfree(not 0).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux