On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:51:36 +0100 Russell King <[email protected]> wrote: > Why would I want to do this, given that decrementing mm->nr_ptes in > free_pgd_slow() would make it negative ? Am I missing something > obvious? You were saying there was no way to figure out which mm is assosociate a particular pgd, and I'm merely showing you how you can in fact do it. :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 0/6] freepgt: free_pgtables shakeup
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] freepgt: free_pgtables shakeup
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] freepgt: free_pgtables shakeup
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] freepgt: free_pgtables shakeup
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] freepgt: free_pgtables shakeup
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] freepgt: free_pgtables shakeup
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] freepgt: free_pgtables shakeup
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] freepgt: free_pgtables shakeup
- From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] freepgt: free_pgtables shakeup
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/6] freepgt: free_pgtables shakeup
- Prev by Date: Re: Toshiba p35 laptop question (2)
- Next by Date: Re: Collecting NX information
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/6] freepgt: free_pgtables shakeup
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/6] freepgt: free_pgtables shakeup
- Index(es):