On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 08:05:13PM +0200, Christophe Saout wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 27.03.2005, 19:26 +0200 schrieb Andi Kleen:
>
> > > preempt_schedule_irq is not an i386 specific function and seems to take
> > > special care of BKL preemption and since reiserfs does use the BKL to do
> > > certain things I think this actually might be the problem...?
> >
> > Hmm, preempt_schedule_irq is not in mainline as far as I can see.
> > My patches are always for mainline; i dont do a special
> > patch kit for -mm*
>
> PREEMPT_BKL has been in mainline since 2.6.11-rc1, preempt_schedule_irq
> made it in 2.6.11-rc3. Please look here:
> http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/search/?expr=preempt_schedule_irq&search=ChangeSet+comments
Hmm, true. I must have missed it with the last merge.
Looking at the changeset your simple patch is probably ok.
>
> Now that I looked into it I think that it's obviously the correct
> solution.
Agreed.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
