Re: [RFC] Some thoughts on device drivers and sysfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RFC] Some thoughts on device drivers and sysfs
From: Arioch <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 00:53:37 +0400
Cc: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050202)

Adam Belay пишет:

I would like to propose that we create a new type of device that would
act as the layer between physical (bus devices) and logical (class

devices).

why not using D-BUS to allow lowlevel drivers to expose its features touserspace?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC] Some thoughts on device drivers and sysfs
  - From: Adam Belay <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] spinlock_t & rwlock_t break_lock member initialization (patch seeking comments included)
Next by Date: Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Some thoughts on device drivers and sysfs
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Some thoughts on device drivers and sysfs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux