Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-10

* Lee Revell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Running for several days with PREEMPT_DESKTOP, on the Athlon XP the 
> worst latency I am seeing is ~150 usecs!  But on the C3 its about 4ms:

could you run a bit with tracing disabled (in the .config) on the C3?  
(but wakeup timing still enabled) It may very well be tracing overhead 
that makes those latencies that high.  Also, we'd thus have some hard 
data on how much overhead tracing is in such a situation, on that CPU.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-10
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-10
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-10
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-10
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-10
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] spinlock_t & rwlock_t break_lock member initialization (patch seeking comments included)
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-10
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-10
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]