On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 08:04:40PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 16:48 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 03:34:34PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 10:28 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 05:52:20PM +0000, Mark Fortescue wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I am writing a "Proprietry" driver module for a "Proprietry" PCI card and
> > > > > I have found that I can't use SYSFS on Linux-2.6.10.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why ?.
> > > >
> > > > What ever gave you the impression that it was legal to create a
> > > > "Proprietry" kernel driver for Linux in the first place.
> > >
> > > The fact that Nvidia and ATI get away with it?
> >
> > So, the fact that someone else is doing something illegal, makes it
> > acceptable for you to do the same thing? Please, talk to a lawyer about
> > this issue if you have _any_ questions.
> >
>
> Well, I never said I agreed with it. But the fact that major vendors do
> it flagrantly might lead someone to think it's not illegal. Why doesn't
> anyone do anything? Afraid they'll drop Linux support rather than find
> a way to open their drivers?
Probably just because no one has gotten around to sueing them just yet.
It's only a matter of time...
And no, I don't think anyone is "afraid" at all, that's just silly.
> Anyway, this is news to me. How about putting it in the FAQ? Too
> politically charged?
Why does it need to be in the FAQ, when the file COPYING in the main
kernel directory explicitly spells this out?
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
