On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 10:10:14AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > This might make sense for devices that end in numbers, but does it really > > make sense for devices that don't? > > Then fix those drivers to not put the number in there if they don't have > one :) > But they do have non -1 ids, the device name itself just doesn't end in a number. In this event, the delimiter makes no sense. These drivers are expecting that you will have <devicename><id>, and application code is expecting the same. /dev follows this convention too, I don't see this as being an unreasonable expectation. If anything, serial8250 is broken and should rename itself to something not ending in a number. It's not nice when one driver exhibits a corner case and decides to change the semantics for everyone else. > I don't see the serial8250 driver adding that .0 to it on my machines, > does this happen on yours? > Yes, we end up having /sys/devices/platform/serial8250 and serial8250.0. Where serial8250.0 ends up as: drwxr-xr-x 3 0 0 0 Jan 1 00:00 . drwxr-xr-x 18 0 0 0 Jan 1 00:00 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 0 Jan 1 00:00 bus -> ../../../bus/platform -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 4096 Jan 1 00:00 detach_state lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 0 Jan 1 00:00 driver -> ../../../bus/platform/drivers/serial8250 drwxr-xr-x 2 0 0 0 Jan 1 00:00 power That doesn't really bother me, having serial8250.0 is more sensible then serial82500. For this type of corner case the delimiter makes sense, but not in a blanket sense. > What userspace code are you referring to? > Anything that expects that it can open a /sys/devices/platform/<device><id> path. I have a few applications like this, I have no reason to doubt that others do too. I don't see any reason to go out of the way to break this convention if the end of the device name is not a number.
Attachment:
pgpwxKqDnkwjG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: [2.6 patch] drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_ppp.c: fix off by one errors
- Next by Date: Re: swsusp 'disk' fails in bk-current - intel_agp at fault?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Separate platform device name from platform device number
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Separate platform device name from platform device number
- Index(es):