On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:32:24 +0100, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> * Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Can someone (Ingo?) recommend me CPU scheduler tests which are usually
> > used to test CPU scheduler perfomance, context switch performance,
> > SMP/migration/balancing performance etc.?
>
> it's not really the microbenchmarks that matter (although they obviously
> are part of the picture), but actual application performance. There are
> dozens of workloads that matter. Kernel compilation timings are an
> obvious priority :-), but there are other things like SPECsdet, STREAM,
> dbt3-pgsql, kernbench, AIM7, various Java benchmarks and more.
>
> now that scheduler changes have calmed down somewhat, we are mainly
> looking for regressions, and are checking schedstats output to see how
> 'healthy' a given workload behaves.
Do you keep the results available somewhere they can be browsed?
Richard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
