Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:22:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Miles Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 24fc1024
> > > c0198448
> > > *pde = 00000000
> > > Oops: 0000 [#1]
> > > CPU: 0
> > > EIP: 0060:[<c0198448>] Not tainted VLI
> >
> > I wonder why the EIP sometimes doesn't get decoded.
> >
> > > Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
> > > EFLAGS: 00210206 (2.6.12-rc1-mm2)
>
> ksymoops seems to remove lines from the kernel output that it doesn't
> like.
but. but. There used to be a symbol+0xN/0xM in the EIP: line. Are you
saying that ksymoops rubbed that out and stuck a hex number in there?
> I've seen this many times on ARM, and each time I see an oops
> from a 2.6 kernel which has been ksymoopsed, I always ask the submitter
> to send the original non-ksymoopsed version.
>
> Users need to be re-educated _not_ to use ksymoops.
I wonder if there's something clever we could do to the kallsymsised oops
output so that ksymoops would simply cease to recognise it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
