Hi,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:02:45PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 12:15 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > I think I found the cause. Special requests submitted using
> > scsi_do_req() never initializes ->end_io(). Normally, SCSI midlayer
> > terminates special requests inside the SCSI midlayer without passing
> > through the blkdev layer. However, if a device is going away or taken
> > offline, blkdev layer gets to terminate special requests and, as
> > ->end_io() is never set-up, nothing happens and the completion gets
> > lost.
>
> The analysis is exactly correct, well done! I think your patch is a bit
> overly complex, though. We can achieve the same effect simply by
> executing the completion without changing the rq_status like the patch
> below.
>
> Jens, To go back to the original problem, except when I hit the usb-
> storage error handling oops, I can plug and unplug to my hearts content
> and everything works.
We have users of scsi_do_req() other than scsi_wait_req() and they
use different done() functions to do different things. I've checked
other done functions and none uses contents inside the passed
scsi_cmnd, so using a dummy command should be okay with them. Am I
missing something here?
Oh, and I would really appreciate if you can fill me in / give a
pointer about the scsi_request/scsi_cmnd distinction.
Thanks a lot.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
