Oleg Nesterov wrote on Monday, March 21, 2005 6:19 AM
> These patches are updated version of 'del_timer_sync: proof of concept'
> 2 patches.
Looks good performance wise. Took a quick micro benchmark measurement on
a 16-node numa box (32-way). Results are pretty nice (to the expectation).
Time to execute del_timer_sync, averaged over 10,000 call:
Vanilla 2.6.11 19,313 ns
2.6.12-rc1-mm1 81 ns
del_singleshot_timer_sync 74ns
Took another measurement on a 4-way smp box:
Vanilla 2.6.11 648 ns
2.6.12-rc1-mm1 55 ns
del_singleshot 41 ns
And Andrew always asks what are the impact on real-world bench, we did
not see performance regression on db transaction processing benchmark
with these set of timer patches versus using del_singleshot_timer_sync.
(del_singleshot_timer_sync is slightly faster, though 14 ns difference
falls well into noise range)
Note: I've only stress tested deleting an un-expired timer.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
