Re: [PATCH] add a clear_pages function to clear pages of higher order

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, David Mosberger wrote:

> That's definitely the case.  See my earlier post on this topic:
>
>   http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/linux-ia64/0409/11012.html
>
> Unfortunately, nobody reported any results for larger machines and/or
> more interesting workloads, so the patch is in limbo at this time.
> Clearly, if the CPU that's clearing the page is likely to use that
> same page soon after, it'd be useful to use temporal stores.


So it would be useful to have

clear_page 	-> Temporal. Only zaps one page

	and

clear_pages	-> Zaps arbitrary order of page non-temporal


Rework the clear_pages patch to do just that? Maybe rename clear_pages
clear_pages_nt?

prep_zero_page would use a temporal clear for an order 0 page but a
nontemporal clear for higher order pages.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] add a clear_pages function to clear pages of higher order
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] add a clear_pages function to clear pages of higher order
    • From: David Mosberger <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc1-mm2] x86_64: fix vsyscall.c syntax error
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] FUSE: comments for dev.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] add a clear_pages function to clear pages of higher order
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] add a clear_pages function to clear pages of higher order
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]