Re: [PATCH 2.6.11] aoe [5/12]: don't try to free null bufpool

On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 07:17 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> don't try to free null bufpool

in linux there is a "rule" that all memory free routines are supposed to
also accept NULL as argument, so I think this patch is not needed (and
even wrong)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.11] aoe [5/12]: don't try to free null bufpool
    • From: [email protected]

• References:
  • [PATCH 2.6.11] aoe [5/12]: don't try to free null bufpool
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.12-rc1-mm2 (patch to fix build error In function `zft_init')
• Next by Date: INITRAMFS: junk in compressed archive
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 2.6.11] aoe [5/12]: don't try to free null bufpool
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.11] aoe [5/12]: don't try to free null bufpool
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]