Re: [PATCH 2/3] Keys: Use RCU to manage session keyring pointer

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> David Howells <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > The attached patch uses RCU to manage the session keyring pointer in struct
> >  signal_struct.
> 
> So are these patches dependent upon the
> keys-use-rcu-to-manage-session-keyring-pointer work?

This patch (2/3) shouldn't be dependent on that. It does extra RCU-age on a
different pointer entirely. The other RCU-age patch deals with specific key
types.

However, the third patch adds extra stuff into keyring support, and so is
RCU'd keyrings dependent.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] Keys: Use RCU to manage session keyring pointer
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 1/3] Keys: Pass session keyring to call_usermodehelper()
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] Keys: Use RCU to manage session keyring pointer
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: repeat a function after fixed time period
• Next by Date: Re: security/keys/key.c broken with defconfig
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Keys: Use RCU to manage session keyring pointer
• Next by thread: [PATCH 3/3] Keys: Make request-key create an authorisation key
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]