Re: alpha spinlock.h update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard Henderson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 01:01:45PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:

I had the impression Richard planned on something more sophisticated
than this??


Indeed.  I suppose I can pass it along to avoid repeated "it doesn't build"
messages, but an smp kernel doesn't run.  *All* processes spawned by init(1)
die with SIGILL very very shortly.  I can only guess that there's been some
change to flushing (icache or tlb) that went wrong.

I wonder if its 4-level page tables. I think DaveM, in another thread, is chasing flush-<something> issues right now, on sparc64.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux