-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/25/2010 07:38 AM, Hiisi wrote: > 2010/8/25 Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 08/25/2010 06:16 AM, Frank Elsner wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I've 2 machines running Fedora 13, both with kernel 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.i686. >>> >>> When I did a "yum check-update" yesterday evening only one machine offered an >>> update to the new new kernel 2.6.33.8-149.fc13.i686. >>> >>> >>> What's behind? Different repos used by yum? >>> >>> >>> --Frank Elsner >> >> Most likely one has a yum cache that isn't yet expired (i.e. you last >> checked the repos more recently on one than the other). >> >> I'd recommend doing 'yum clean all' and then try again. >> >> - -- >> Stephen Gallagher >> RHCE 804006346421761 >> > > I wouldn't dare to suggest using 'yum clean all' on this list. It's > nearly the same big mistake as posting in html. > Seriously, do one need to clean all in this situation or clean > metadata should be enough? Sorry, my yum-fu isn't that strong. I just recommended the quickest option to guarantee that it would be cleaned :) - -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkx1CqsACgkQeiVVYja6o6MlugCgkwo+wjbDxUxAKpyQAbUYq5Ef HcsAnib1VJUO2OAhgFH+sdHsH3gAspRW =pjfS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
