Unless RedHat has cleaned up their act, RH support is a, well, joke.
The CentOS forums are a much better way to go.
It has been a couple of years since I tried to do so, but setting up a
central CentOS updates repository is trivial. Setting up one with RH is
a bit of a chore and one has to wonder if it violates RH's license to do so.
On 06/16/2010 09:48 AM, birger wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 09:35 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>> Agreed, but it's worth mentioning that CentOS tracks RHEL releases and
>> is available at no cost (and consequently no paid support).
>>
> As my boss said it when I presented the budget forecast for my RHEL
> licenses; "It's less than the rounding errors in our other license
> budgets". Paying for basic support for RHEL should not be a problem.
> Actually, my biggest motivation for running CentOS on development and
> test servers is to avoid the technical part of the licensing hassle. And
> of course I run CentOS at home.
>
>
--
Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution.
Let us not make it a blank paper by construction."
--Thomas Jefferson, letter to Wilson Nicholas, 1803
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-- Ed Howdershelt (Author)
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
