Re: Another funny update?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 13:20:28 -0500,
>  Kevin Martin <kevintm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> <snip>
>>
>> Shouldn't there be a way for yum/packagekit to understand the
>> interdependencies when kmod packages are installed such that a new
>> kernel update is *not* offered if the corresponding kmod package that
>> uses it is not available?  Could this be a new yum extension I see in
>> the future?
>
> I think it can do it now. One approach would be that when a kmod is first
> built it conflicts against any later kernels. This should block kernel
> updates. Then when a kmod is made for a later version of the kernel,
> the earlier kmod gets an update that no longer conflicts with later kernels.

I used to use kmod-nvidia(-PAE) and what I used to do was:
yum check-update

Then if there was a kernel but no kmod update listed then I did an
update excluding the kernel -

Later in the day do it again and if the kmod is then available do a
complete update -
Is that so difficult?

I also used to use akmod-nvidia and found after some trial and error
that there was no -PAE version whereas there was a -PAE version of
kmod-nvidia-PAE so one had to be a little careful about exactly which
package to use!

Hope this helps.

-- 
mike c
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux