Re: ssh to my computer behind NAT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 00:17 -0600 schrieb Rick Sewill:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 00:08 -0600, Rick Sewill wrote: 
> > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 08:40 +0300, Hiisi wrote: 
> > > 2010/3/9 Rick Sewill <rsewill@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 00:49 +0300, Hiisi wrote:
> > > >> Dear list!
> > > >> I would like to be able to ssh to my home computer located behind my
> > > >> ISP' NAT. I know, I can tunnel to it through some middle host and
> > > >> actually I'm doing it at the moment. But I'm fancy is there a better
> > > >> solution? Is there a possibility of not using any computer at the
> > > <--SNIP-->
> > > >
> > > > If it's a company gateway, we mustn't help you defeat their security.
> > > >
> > > > I don't want to discuss whether having a gateway adds to security.
> > > > Personally, I believe all devices in the internal LAN must be secure.
> > > > I do not believe security can be done solely at the border of a LAN.
> > > >
> > > > Do you control the device that is doing NAT for you or does the ISP?
> > > > If controlled by the ISP, did the ISP provide a way to configure it?
> > > >
> > > > As others have said and will say, one needs to have the NAT device
> > > > port forward the appropriate port (whatever port you use for ssh)
> > > > to your host.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > > You and other, thank for your responses. Sorry I didn't make it clear.
> > > I don't have any router. I'm connected to Internet via LAN. My IP
> > > address is something like 192.168.3.20 and I use ISP' router IP
> > > (192.168.0.1) as a gateway (I don't have any access to the router).
> > > So, I decided its called NAT. Am I wrong here? I don't know. I know
> > > only that I can't reach my computer from the outside of the LAN. So, I
> > > did the following: on the target computer I ran:
> > > ssh -R 10002:localhost:22 user@xxxxxxxxxxx (it's a computer somewhere
> > > and I have ssh access there)
> > > Now I can connect to the target computer in a few steps:
> > > 1. connect to middle.host:
> > > ssh user@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > 2. and from there:
> > > ssh Hiisi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -p 10002
> > > See, it's not very convenient and I'm not sure whether it's possible
> > > to use VNC using this setup (as I would like to).  So, is there any
> > > better solution?
> > > -- 
> > > Hiisi.
> > > Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/
> > > --
> > > Spandex is a privilege, not a right.
> > 
> > Your explanation of a middle host is good.  
> > I didn't understand what you were doing, previously.
> > 
> > Your description of NAT is fine.  Your ISP is doing NAT.
> > 
> > My first thought is to say, talk to the ISP.
> > The ISP should have a way for you to configure their NAT router
> > to forward the ssh port to your host.
> > 
> > I have difficulty thinking why the ISP wouldn't let you configure
> > their NAT router to forward the ssh port to your host...unless.
> > 
> > I hadn't thought of it before, but putting customers behind a NAT
> > router, and not letting customers configure the NAT router to 
> > forward ports, might be a way to prevent customers running servers.
> > 
> > Is this what the ISP is trying to do?  Stop customers running servers?
> > 
> > If a customer wants to run a server, even an ssh server,
> > which is what you wish to do, does the ISP wish to charge more money?
> > 
> > If the ISP is deliberately stopping you, I'd say get another ISP.
> > If you can't get another ISP, I don't know what to suggest.
> > 
> 
> I just thought of another possibility the ISP might be doing.
> 
> Are you, and some other customers of the ISP, sharing the same public
> IP address?  Doing so would reduce the number of public IP addresses
> the ISP would need.  I'd be very, very surprised if an ISP did this.
> I'd be more than surprised.  I'd be shocked.
> 
> 
> 
It's usual for ISP to do so, at least outside U.S.A. Public IP4 
addresses are scarce even in Germany: German Telekom provides a public
IP to my DSL router, O2 provides an non-routable  10.x.x.x address to 
my 3G device. The only solution will be IPv6. I hope it will come soon.

Joerg

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux