Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Ed Greshko wrote: > > >> http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.4/html/Deployment_Guide/ch-nfs.html >> >> States.... >> >> |rpc.mountd| — This process receives mount requests from NFS clients and >> verifies the requested file system is currently exported. This process >> is started automatically by the |nfs| service and does not require user >> configuration. This is not used with NFSv4. >> > > and if that's truly the case, then the NFS start script > /etc/init.d/nfs should not try to invoke rpc.mountd (or rpc.statd for > that matter) when it's obvious that you're trying to run exclusively > with NFSv4, no? if that's the case, i can bugzilla that as well but i > want to make sure that it's really an error first. > > I suppose a case could be made for that either way. Seems rather minor to me. I've not yet had time to look a this stuff. However, is there any downside from starting rpc.mountd even if it isn't going to be used?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
