Re: PAE kernel on 1GB system?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ian Pilcher wrote:
I am setting up a fanless 1GB VIA C7 system to run Asterisk.  (It also
has a 32GB SSD -- no moving parts at all!)  By default anaconda uses the
i686 PAE kernel for this system, presumably because the C7 instruction
set qualifies it as an i686.

I can't think of any reason to use a PAE kernel on this system, so I'm
thinking of switching to the i586 kernel.  Can anyone see any
disadvantage to making the switch?

I think it limits the size of application you can run, although a big application would live mostly in swap and run slowly, and you're unlikely to do that. I can't think of any big benefit, either, if saving a few bytes is an issue you should build a custom kernel and cut out anything you don't need.

Any problem using the i686 versions of glibc, openssl, and any other
userspace packages?

No, I have both kernels on several machines and have booted them, at one point the PAE would blank my display on boot and the non-PAE worked (but only used 3 of 8 GB RAM). That went away a while ago, but either will work.

If you think it will make a difference try it, it will boot and run.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux