Re: Munged Headers....

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 16:31:18 +1000,
  Cameron Simpson <cs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Bruno, I notice you're running mutt-1.5.18. I'm running 1.5.20 and it
> produces much nicer results, which are visibly good to the human eye. In
> fact it takes Frank's not properly 2407 encoded header and undoes it
> and writes an unencoded address, nice and clear.
> 
> Maybe you could upgrade - it would save a lot of bickering:-)

I have been planning to upgrade this machine for a while (both software
and replacing the hardware).

> Bruno, could you attach Frank's original message, as it is in _your_
> mail folder, to your reply for inspection? I'd like to compare it
> against my copy and the copy Ed sent me. I have trouble believing
> they're all the same.

I don't have the copy that I originally replied to. I have a copy I pulled
from the archive when I started looking in to the issue. I send you that
attachment privately and try to supply what would have been on the cc header
in the same message (without sending another copy back to the list).

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux