Re: Kernel - PAE vs. non-PAE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm installing Fedora 11 on a rather ancient Toshiba Satellite 1905-S303 laptop which ought to be tossed in the trash can, and that has the PAE kernel installed, too.

Bob


On 06/30/2009 09:27 PM, Steven F. LeBrun wrote:
When I installed F11 on my Toshiba laptop, it installed the PAE version of the kernel. I am assuming that my laptop has a CPU with Physical Address Extensions functionality and can therefore address up to 64GB of memory.

My laptop only has 3 GB installed. Can anyone explain the pro's and con's of using the PAE version of Linux kernel instead of the non-PAE version?

Would the PAE version of the 32-bit Linux Kernel see 4 GB of memory if it was installed where Vista 32-bits only sees about 3GB? For that matter would the non-PAE version see the full 4 GB?

--
  Steven F. LeBrun

Quote: /"There are 10 types of people in this world, those that understand binary and those who don't."/


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux